windows vista, page 2
yeah...ure right windows in not secure enought but thats not the biggest problem for me...
some people say that Bill Gates has made the perfect windows BUT there is no deal for him to realese it coz he cant make a better windows...and money bla-bla...i dont believe that...but...dunno
everything is money
some people say that Bill Gates has made the perfect windows BUT there is no deal for him to realese it coz he cant make a better windows...and money bla-bla...i dont believe that...but...dunno
everything is money
bocaccio11 Open your eyes
on October 14th, 2006
/ post 12321
All this talk about which is better or worse..its all good as long as you know what your doin. Mac is for advanced users and alot of ppl use for audio and video editing. And i want a mac but ill keep my pc too. Just want the best of both worlds.
enen wrote:
some people say that Bill Gates has made the perfect windows BUT there is no deal for him to realese it coz he cant make a better windows...and money bla-bla...i dont believe that...but...dunno
everything is money
some people say that Bill Gates has made the perfect windows BUT there is no deal for him to realese it coz he cant make a better windows...and money bla-bla...i dont believe that...but...dunno
everything is money
this is non sense .. there is NO operating system which is 100% secured .. but the point is which is better reliable, secured and stable (using an OS just because it's more decent or good looking is just like when you build a very nice and wonderful house on a non-solid edge of a deep valley, you might disappear with your house in one second) :) ... Basically, we have two kinds of any software .. Open Source and Closed Source .. Logically, when you think about it, it's very easy to realise that open source code softwares have more chances to get its bugs closed, errors fixed, improvements added....etc .... as the main source code is available to everyone wants it and the very obvious example is UNIX which was created firstly by Dennis Ritchie & Ken Thompson in late 60's at AT&T Bell Labs .. in June 1972 there were more than 10 different distributions for UNIX .. on the other hand, the closed source code software like Windows has no available source code, Bill Gates think he is the only genius on earth so his software needs no improvements .. but everyday, he sees a new proof for his stupidity .. yes I know that windows is dominating the market share, but for what? Personal Computers? ..
both Windows and UNIX operating systems are written in C which is the only programming language capable of creating a huge software like an Operating System .. but what a big difference between both !!
and the easiest known UNIX-Based operating system starting from its 5 clicks installation ending to network configuration is Mac OS X .. in OS X you need no drivers after installation, no cd key....etc ... you really enjoy "Plug & Play" .. in Windows, I call it "Plug & Pray"
bocaccio11 Open your eyes
on October 14th, 2006
/ post 12323
come on now i should of known i was diggin myself a hole the point is you commissar know way more bout os's than i do...so i believe what you say..but ill have to wait on a mac..until i can afford it....fast response too.
Commissar wrote:
they said, Vista RC1 utilizes some 256 x 256 pixel icons, offering four times the resolution of the icons in Tiger (I dont know if 128 x 4 = 256, maybe I have to restudy some mathematics).
they said, Vista RC1 utilizes some 256 x 256 pixel icons, offering four times the resolution of the icons in Tiger (I dont know if 128 x 4 = 256, maybe I have to restudy some mathematics).
just check it, using a simple example. 2x2=4. 4x4=16
using those numbers:
128x128=16384
256x256=65536
btw, i'd like to clear again (if it wasn't clear enough before :)): i'm not a fan of ms win, and i haven't tried mac before, but maybe i'll in the near future. but that article is dated as July 31, 2005. Older than a year...
btw, i think i'd have only one problem with mac, just like with unix/linux systems for the desktop... what level of compatibility do they have? i mean it's ok to use photoshop, quicktime, browse the net.... but it seems it has the same problem like linux now: does it have a wide spread of applications? games? (office is available as i know)
only one question: why does apple offer ms win on his platform if os x is better? what would make a mac (with an intel x86 cpu) different from any pc?
viktor1983 wrote:
just check it, using a simple example. 2x2=4. 4x4=16
using those numbers:
128x128=16384
256x256=65536
just check it, using a simple example. 2x2=4. 4x4=16
using those numbers:
128x128=16384
256x256=65536
I was just kidding :) but I dont believe that Vista will be able to utilize 256x256 icons
viktor1983 wrote:
btw, i think i'd have only one problem with mac, just like with unix/linux systems for the desktop... what level of compatibility do they have? i mean it's ok to use photoshop, quicktime, browse the net.... but it seems it has the same problem like linux now: does it have a wide spread of applications? games? (office is available as i know)
only one question: why does apple offer ms win on his platform if os x is better? what would make a mac (with an intel x86 cpu) different from any pc?
btw, i think i'd have only one problem with mac, just like with unix/linux systems for the desktop... what level of compatibility do they have? i mean it's ok to use photoshop, quicktime, browse the net.... but it seems it has the same problem like linux now: does it have a wide spread of applications? games? (office is available as i know)
only one question: why does apple offer ms win on his platform if os x is better? what would make a mac (with an intel x86 cpu) different from any pc?
you can find the same games you see for PC coming out for Mac but unlike PC, you cant download and crack it, you have to buy it
Apple didnt and will never offer Windows on its Platform .. the story that Apple used to use an IBM/Motorolla processor called PowerPC in the past, and they had a deal with them to do a fast new processor in a specific time, but a delay happened, and stayed for long, so Apple decided to move to another compnay, they had talking with Intel & AMD .. AMD had some probs too, Intel was just ready and willing .. so the big Apple move to Intel just happened ... and just by coinsedence when Apple used Intel processors, their computers became able to run Windows, and they offered the Bootcamp for that, they considered it as a chance to attract more users to Apple .. but they never supported or even admitted Windows as an operating system (if you saw the presentation which I posted its link many times here,you would know the difference and you would laugh about how they make fun of Windows Vista), also Apple always get the candy first, Apple invented many technologies we all cant live without like USB, FireWire and Bluetooth, they got their own Graphics processing and system buses, and now they use a wide range of Intel processors, Intel Core Duo, Intel Core 2 Duo and Intel Xeon for all desktops, Laptops, workstations and servers .. and what makes them different is the whole out-of-the-box package, you get out your iMac or MacBookPro for example from its box and open it to find it just ready, system Mac OS X installed with all its applications and tools, and as I said before and as you know for sure that not only the hardware that counts, the operating system running this hardware and managing it is the main point, and as I said too UNIX can make use of 256MB Memory better than Windows make use of 512MB !! .. this is a simple example ... Mac OS X is a powerful system, offers you a very attractive, easy and fabolous interface with a strong solid UNIX foundation (Darwin/Mach built on FreeBSD) lying under the hood, you dont have to use or even see it but definately, you really feel its power
a very simple example if you really wanna know the difference between Apple & PC .. open a very high resolution image in Photoshop on a PC, make a close Zoom, then scroll down, you will find the page going down in frames (going in a slow hard shitty way, pixeling) .. do the same in Photoshop on Apple .. you will find it going smoothly just like you are scrolling a text page
about Mac Hardware & Software Compatibility
and here are words coming out of Bill Gates:
“To create a new standard, it takes something that’s not just a little bit different, it takes something that’s really new and really captures people’s imagination and the Macintosh, of all the machines I’ve ever seen, is the only one that meets that standard.” — Bill Gates
"The next generation of interesting software will be done on the Macintosh, not the IBM PC." --Bill Gates
so, again I say to all people who claim that transition from windows to Mac is very hard and blah blah... NO, it's just you act as lazy ducks :) .. it's not that hard at all, but it's just a kind of culture got spread all over the world, and you know what If Jobs had marketed his Apple operating system in the same way as Gates, few people would know the name Microsoft today
ps: viktor, you need to try Mac because who get in Mac, never go back :)
wow, i thought os x runs only on intel processors... now i've googled, and some users managed to run it on amd processors too, the only requirement is the sse2 capability. so maybe i'll give it a try in vmware or something... i'm quite familiar with win/unix systems, so maybe it'll be a little strange to have an os that i haven't seen before :)
btw, are there big differences comparing to win or unix systems?
btw, are there big differences comparing to win or unix systems?
viktor1983 wrote:
wow, i thought os x runs only on intel processors
wow, i thought os x runs only on intel processors
Apple had started moving to Intel in April 2006 and finished the big move (Mac Pro and Xserve) in August 2006 :) .. so now, you got two kinds of softwares for Apple, PowerPC software (from OS to smallest programs) and Universal software which is able to run natively on both PowerPC and Intel :)
viktor1983 wrote:
btw, are there big differences comparing to win or unix systems?
btw, are there big differences comparing to win or unix systems?
Well .. First I'd just highlight on the history of Mac OS X .. as my personal opinion, Steve Jobs just did the best Operating System by combining the simplicity, easy & attractive interface of Windows with the power and enoumrous features of UNIX .. after Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak invented the first Personal Computer ever in a garage and created that name and logo (Apple), Wozniak left early to Hewlett Packard and after some years, Steve Jobs left Apple in 1982 to NeXT, he wanted to create the best Operating System, so after researches, he found that nothing is better than UNIX to start with as a core for his new system due to the decades UNIX had seen and its great reputation, later Apple bought this software from NeXT with the return of Steve Jobs to Apple as the CEO .. and from here came Mac OS X :)
Second, your question is about things which exist in Mac OS X and doesnt exist neither in Windows nor in UNIX .. well, i'll try to mention some of the best
** 64-Bit: full native 64-bit support from top to bottom that allows applications to take complete advantage of 64-bit processing while maintaining full performance and compatibility for existing 32-bit Mac OS X applications and drivers
** Windows: enhancements to Boot Camp, Apple's innovative technology that was previewed as a public beta in April 2006, making it possible to run Windows natively on Intel-based Macs
** Spotlight: improved searching that's even faster, provides richer previews, and lets users search across network mounted folders on other machines
** Spaces: I dont consider this one as a new idea cause Linux introduced it before .. but sure here its more beautiful and flexiable, you have four desktops which you can run from one to another, specify everyone for a specific kind of application, like a space for Mail & Safari, a space for video editing application and so on
** Time Machine: every Mac user can say goodbye to any mistakes he does because now with Time Machine, time is a dimension and you can go back in time to any day you want even through years and pick only what you want then come back to the present
** iChat: Now, all PhotoBooth effects are available in iChat, so you can appear in a very funny shapes to your friends via iChat using iSight .. also you can use iChat in Business like viewing a photo slide show or a presentation to your collegue or partner .. ever more, I can put any image or video in the background
(this guy was actually a room away from Steve Jobs appearing at the bottom infront of the Apple Cinema Display)
(and this with an effect)
** Dashboard: a new feature called Web Clip which you can easily snap a shot of a specific part of a web page and everytime you bring the dashboard, you will be able to see that part of the web page with all changes happening, even more they included a new tool subset of Xcode named it DashCode that will give you the ability to create widgets for your needs with many ready template codes and other stuff
** Mail & iCal: witnessed a bunch of improvements, iCal 3 with group calendaring capabilities, event drop box, and standards-based CalDAV support .. (this how Mail will look like)
** Core Animation: this is the real revolution and this is what really developers will love so much .. after Apple introduced Core Image, Core Audio and Core Video before .. now Core Animation will be out .. when a developer modifies an attribute of a layer, Core Animation automatically interpolates the intermediate steps (color, opacity, etc.) between the changes, visually enhancing these applications and reducing the amount of source code that would have been required using traditional Cocoa animation techniques .. simply Core Animation is a new graphics technology that makes it easy to create stunning visual effects and animations .. Time Machine and Spaces were created using Core Animation
you cannot post in this forum.
click here to to create a user account to participate in our forum.
click here to to create a user account to participate in our forum.
Top 20 Torrents (last 25 days)» John Digweed - Compiled & Mixed 38 - 01-Nov-2024 » John Digweed - Transitions 1053 (Live @ Fabric, London & Guest Christian Smith) - 01-Nov-2024 » Deep Dish - Live @ Soho Garden, IMS Dubai Closing Party - 15-Nov-2024 » John Digweed - Transitions 1054 (Guest AFFKT) - 08-Nov-2024 » Dave Seaman - Live @ Freddie's at Pikes (Ibiza) - 07-Oct-2024 » James Zabiela - Mixing Records - November 2024 » John Digweed - Transitions 1055 (Guest Jonas Rathsman) - 15-Nov-2024 » Anthony Pappa - Live at The Gasometer, Melbourne - 04-Nov-2024 » Sven Vath - EG.1001 - November 2024 » Steve Lawler - Live at PENDULUM - Mode, Miami - November 2024 » Sharam - Live from Sonic Soul Tribe, Burning Man - Yoshitoshi Radio 127 [HQ] - November 2024 » G.Pal - Live at Bolivar Beach, Athens, Greece (Opening Set for John Digweed) - 06-Sep-2024 » Hernan Cattaneo - Resident 704 - 02-Nov-2024 » Maceo Plex - Awakenings Sunday Closing ADE - October 2024 » Joris Voorn - Awakenings x Spectrum ADE 2024 [HQ] - October 2024 » Marcelo Vasami B2B Nicolas Rada - Live @ Lemuria Boat Party All Day Long [HQ] - 14-Sep-2024 » Joris Voorn - Live @ Hool & Gate at Bogota, Colombia - 19-Apr-2024 » Ezequiel Arias - Live from the Anjunakitchen [HQ] - October 2024 » Dubfire - Presents Homeless Homies Fundraiser (ADE - Amsterdam) HQ - 18-Oct-2024 » Dave Seaman - Radio Therapy Broadcast [HQ] - November 2024
Recent from the Forum (Be Social)» hey, lottery winners!!! post your testimonials!!! 3h 19m » ADE 2024 » Torrents Recommended for REMOVAL by Staff » Shoutbox features » October 11th - 13th 2024 Tomorrowland Brasil » September 14th & 15th Ultra Japan Tokyo » July 12th - 14th Ultra Europe » August 23rd - 25th Creamfields » BBC Radio 1 Shows from January 2024 » August 8th-11th Untold Cluj-Napoca
...and to make their work easier they use COPY/PASTE
That's an obvious reason for why Steve Jobs in the last WWDC started the Leopard presentation saying that there are some TOP SECRET features which Apple would never reveal now and added "“We don’t want our friends to start their photocopiers any sooner than they have to.”
Now let's take it as a real comparison .. Logical and very simple one (Thanks to Paul Thurrott)
Windows Vista RC1 in a matter of how closes the gap, though I don't think the beta Aero GUI we're seeing now is quite as nice looking as Tiger's Aqua. In Vista, Microsoft has added a number of visual effects that Mac users have enjoyed for four years :), including translucencies, high-resolution icons, and animation effects that are both attractive and functional.
Because Apple has had four "major" OS X revisions to fine tune the GUI So Logically, the OS X Finder is cleaner looking and better implemented than is Aero in Vista. For example, while Apple has fixed problems with the display from underlying windows bleeding through to the windows above them, Microsoft is clearly suffering from some growing pains. In Vista RC1, underlying windows can often cause a muddy-looking display that is distracting and sometimes even ugly.
Icons in Windows XP are generally rendered at 32 x 32 pixels or 64 x 64 pixels in some cases, but the 128 x 128 pixel icons in OS X Tiger are much nicer. they said, Vista RC1 utilizes some 256 x 256 pixel icons, offering four times the resolution of the icons in Tiger (I dont know if 128 x 4 = 256, maybe I have to restudy some mathematics). Anyway we'll have to wait and see whether the icons in the final Vista version are true resolution-independent vector graphics as promised. This would offer even better quality and would be better suited to the high-DPI displays of the future.
Both Tiger and Vista RC1 offer various animations in the shell. For example, Tiger includes a "genie" effect when you minimize windows and a "poof of smoke" when you delete an icon from the Dock. These animations are visually attractive, but they're not just eye candy. Instead, the point of these animations is to provide visual feedback to the user that something has happened. When you minimize a window, the genie effect shows you "where" the minimized window went so you can more easily find it later. RC1 offers similar animations. When you animate a window, it visually appears to minimize to the appropriate taskbar button.
In short, though there are many bizarre inconsistencies in the Tiger UI, it is far more elegant looking than Aero in Vista RC1. That makes sense, as Vista is still in a very early beta version and will likely be improved dramatically in future releases.
So honestly and as a Judge, I say the Vista RC1 design is not bad but still got much to do, but personally I believe that Bill Gates can only design a bag to carry my Mac in :)
Microsoft claims that Windows XP and, by extension, Windows Vista, were architected for security, thanks to their NT roots. That claim is, however Windows NT was designed in the pre-Internet days, and though the system's architecture is extensible, modern Windows versions are further screwed by the inclusion of the buggy and insecure IE Web browser and other design mistakes. In short, Windows is a house of cards that seems increasingly incapable of handling today's demands.
Mac OS X, meanwhile, was truly designed for excellent security, thanks to its wonderful UNIX roots and clean architecture. And OS X, for whatever its worth, benefits from its relatively small market share, compared to Windows; because the OS X user base is so small, so few hackers ever bother to try and attack the system. Windows, meanwhile, is a minefield of constant hacks and attacks.
Therefore, OS X is, in many ways, more secure than Windows is today. But Microsoft has spent the last several years re-engineering its operating systems and applications to be more secure, and that ongoing work will ultimately result in a system that is quite secure and more easily securable than any of the competition.
So how does the security of OS X Tiger really compare with that of Vista RC1 and the subsequent Community Technical Previews (CTPs)? It's a tough call. The RC1 adds some security features that OS X has had for years, and it does have a few nice stuff that OS X lacks. But it's hard to vote against OS X here. The Vista RC1, after all, is still Windows. And though it's unlikely that present and coming Betas of Vista will be targeted by a wide range of hackers, future releases most certainly will be, so in some ways, any discussion of security now is somewhat academic. we'll have to see how Windows Vista fares in the real world when it's released.
but anyways here are 10 reasons for how OS X is the most secured:
01. Secure Foundation: Open Source and heavily reviewed BSD/Mach and Security Architecture - CDSA
02. Conservative Configuration: Services OFF, ports CLOSED, Root Account DISABLED
03. Stay Protected: Software Update Servers, Security Web portal, Security Email Notifications
04. Strong Authentication: Smart Cards, Biometrics, PAM, Kerberos, Open Directory (AD, LDAP, NIS, BSD)
05. HSPD-12: Smart Cards (CAC, GSCIS, PIV), Built-in operating system support for PIV / FIPS-201
06. Secure Data Storage: FileVault, Encrypted Disk Images (AES-128), FIPS 140-2 (In-Process)
07. Network Security: FireWall, VPN (PPTP, LT2P), 802.1x (TLS, TTLS, LEAP, PEAP), SSL, SSH
08. Product Certifications: Common Criteria (CAPP/EAL3), FIPS 140-2 (In-Process), Certificate of Authorization
09. Application/Attachment Integrity Checks: Safe Mail Attachment Handling, Access Control to Secure Credentials
10. Easy-to-Manage Security: Usable and Configurable for Personal, Workgroup, or Enterprise